The clear and present danger is mass unemployment, and we should deal with it, now.
(via Portuguese Memories (Trivial and Personal) - NYTimes.com) Krugman is on the far right [haha]; as commenter CrabbyTom in NC says, “PK’s Dylan period.”

(via Portuguese Memories (Trivial and Personal) - NYTimes.com) Krugman is on the far right [haha]; as commenter CrabbyTom in NC says, “PK’s Dylan period.”

To me, it sounds like a fiscal version of the classic definition of chutzpah — namely, killing your parents, then demanding sympathy because you’re an orphan. Here we have conservatives telling us that we must tighten our belts despite mass unemployment, because otherwise future conservatives will keep running deficits once times improve.
If the press decide that scandals are going to be the topic, the absence of actual scandals may not matter.

I believe that’s eurospeak for “the beatings will continue until morale improves.” (via The Beatings Must Continue - NYTimes.com)

I believe that’s eurospeak for “the beatings will continue until morale improves.” (via The Beatings Must Continue - NYTimes.com)

But I think there was something even bigger, in some ways, than his policy failures: Bush brought an unprecedented level of systematic dishonesty to American political life, and we may never recover.
The austerity agenda looks a lot like a simple expression of upper-class preferences, wrapped in a facade of academic rigor. What the top 1 percent wants becomes what economic science says we must do.